Thanks to everyone who worked to end DADT

I'd like to thank my friends and family for their efforts in ending the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law. It means a lot for me, as I had honestly given up hope of it happening any time soon.

It's too easy to be cynical, but as I watched the past two years go by, and watched the hugest congressional majority in recent memory evaporate, I thought for sure there would be no progress on queer issues. And although I told myself I was content with Obama just naming Supreme Court justices, I was enraged by the contradiction of his "fierce advocate" image shown by his administration's aggressive defense of DOMA, his utter inaction on ENDA and DOMA, and the snail's pace of DADT repeal (coupled with continued vigorous legal defense of the law). I had come to the conclusion that the Democrats had decided that gay votes, gay money, and gay wedge issues were simply too valuable to them to give up, and that they would hold us hostage for another six years or until the courts finally grew a pair. I just couldn't take the disappointment anymore, so I really stopped investing any hope.

Sure, I went through the motions with emails to elected officials (pointless, since I vote in Georgia), but I really couldn't bring myself to care a great deal. I was resigned to it. But this is where my family and friends really stepped in and pushed this through. I'm very thankful and grateful for friends and family who care enough about me to take on issues that affect me - without my having to ask. It really means a lot.

It was a little over two years ago when a former friend's opposition to same-sex marriage made me snap and made me raise my expectations of what friends and family will do to help with the issues of queer people. I'm thrilled to say that not only did they take action, they did it without my asking.

Granted, these issues affect us all — when some of us aren't free, all of us aren't free — but when the folks on the comfortable side of the privilege line do more than I do on issues that affect me, it really is touching. Thank you.

Bechdel's law: women as props in film

Charlie Stross wrote today about what he calls "Bechdel's Law" on movies:

1. Does it have at least two women in it,
2. Who [at some point] talk to each other,
3. About something besides a man.

I immediately thought about Iron Man, which we saw last night and greatly enjoyed – and of course it fails the test. So does basically every single film made in Hollywood: the only exceptions that come to mind are Sex and the City (which I haven't seen yet, but I presume they talk about anal beads or something other than Mr. Big at least sometimes), The Hours, Mamma Mia!, and maybe Notes on a Scandal... and I'm done – as far as I know, that's it.

Alison Bechdel's blog features the 1985 cartoon where The Rule entered the mass consciousness, and explains the origin. I've been a big fan of Dykes To Watch Out For since I was just a wee budding queer, reading Southern Voice (the "Lesbian Home Journal" on actual newsprint) and scratching my head over Mo (who irritated me greatly). Bechdel has always stayed on my mind over the years, her characters sticking to me even more than Ethan Green (which became a movie?!?) and Hothead Paisan. Bechdel's Fun Home was also a fantastic read.

But back to the subject at hand. Stross continues:

From now on I intend to start applying this test to my fiction before I embarrass myself in public. And (I realize this is offering up a huge hostage to future fortune) if anyone ever offers me a movie or TV deal, I am going to hold out for a clause in the contract requiring a scene lasting at least 30 seconds per hour of running time that passes Bechdel's test. Because? What hurts my fellow humans hurts me, and I can in conscience no more lend my implicit support to an anti-feminist backlash than I can lend my silence to a racist or homophobic campaign.

What a guy. Not only do I greatly enjoy his books, I think he's a swell person, and I think his response to Bechdel's Law is a very good idea. Maybe this could spread to other authors? Hel-lo, writing workshops everywhere?

Squeezebox mash note

A couple of months ago I ordered a new home music player, the Squeezebox Duet. I was a little reluctant because it wasn't cheap (nearly $500 by the time you include shipping, import duties, etc) and it requires server software, but I liked the look of it and I liked the fact that the server software was open source. I didn't really look too deeply: I just thought "shiny!" and dug out my credit card. Besides, my bro-in-law loves his old Squeezebox, so I figured it'd be good.

But zOMG, I was totally unprepared for what I got: more than meets the eye. This thing is incredible – a real example of what a great product a company can build when it totally understands how to use open source software to build a platform and build a committed community of users and developers. Everything about it is cool. Yes, I knew I was essentially buying an iPod-style remote control for my stereo which would hook to my network and suck all of my music off my computer (actually, my NAS). But it really is a platform.

First, the hardware is very slick. It is well designed, feels nice, looks very chic, and has tons of room to grow. They built in so many extras that the platform can grow for a long time just catching up with the hardware: 3-axis accelerometer, USB adapter and SD flash slot on the remote, WiFi all over the place... simply spectacular. You could build a bunch of cool things on this platform.

Second, the software is quite capable. It was easy to install (on Ubuntu, I just had to add their repository and the package). Unfortunately, the latest version of the server software, SqueezeCenter, has not yet been adapted to run on the NSLU2 I purchased for the express purpose, but it is doing okay on my four-year-old laptop. Besides, I might be able to put it directly on my NAS200 soon.

Third, they're working quite actively on the software, and they walk the talk when it comes to full disclosure: the whole stack is open. They not only release all of their code, they give you a real toolchain and support in making changes. Unlike other devices which manufacturers churn out and abandon, they've recently released an update to the remote control firmware that addresses issues with seeking through music lists, making it much more friendly and responsive. The remote control software also builds and runs on desktop Linux, OSX, and even ghetto Windows (a true tour de force) which makes it easy to build and debug your add-in modules (in Lua: how very nerd chic) or your own custom firmware. It also just gives you a nice remote control to run on your laptop. The open source firmware makes it possible for a community of hackers to come up with endless cool applications for all of that tasty overengineering that went into the remote.

But here's the clincher: I had an issue with my album images not showing up. I've been compulsively tagging my music collection and applying album images to make the lists look pretty, but the images weren't showing up properly – even worse, it was sending corrupt images to the browser, throwing the format and making it all look weird. So I started looking at it, and reported the problem on their bugtrack system. One of their engineers fixed it fourteen hours later; I grabbed the in-development build the next day and my issue was fixed. Twenty-four hour turnaround.

That is not only great service, it helps them build and take advantage of a community of expert users. Unlike some companies which persecute people who fix their problems, at least one part of Logitech has it figured out.